PENGGUNAAN PAKAN NON KONVENSIONAL TERFERMENTASI DALAM RANSUM TERHADAP NILAI ORGANOLEPTIK DAGING AYAM BROILER THE USE FERMENTED NON CONVENTIONAL FEED IN RATIONSON THE ORGANOLEPTICS VALUE OF BROILER MEAT

Main Article Content

Anggraeni
Elis Dihansih
Deden Sudrajat
Aldi Renaldi

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of non-conventional fermented feed substitution in rations on the sensory properties of broiler chicken meat. It was held from May to June 2017 which was located in the poultry pens of the Department of Animal Husbandry, Juanda University, Bogor. Tests for proximate analysis of palm kernel meal, coconut meal, tofu dregs, and cassava were carried out at the Laboratory of the Center for Biological Resources and Biotechnology Research, Bogor Agricultural University, while the sensory test for broiler chicken meat was carried out at the Sartika Laboratory, Djuanda University, Bogor. This study used 24 chickens. The research design used was a completely randomized design with 6 treatments and 4 replications. The feed used consists of R0 = 100% basic feed, R1 = 90% basic feed + 10% fermented non-conventional feed, R2 = 75% basic feed + 25% fermented non-conventional feed, R3 = 60% basic ration + 40% unconventional fermented feed, R4 = 45% basic feed + 55% fermented non-conventional feed, R5 = 30% basic feed + 70% non-conventional feed. Meat samples were taken from the breast to test the sensory quality of the meat. The variables observed were the sensory properties of the meat consisting of aroma, color, tenderness, taste and juiceness. The organoleptic assessment was carried out by hedonic test and hedonic quality, the assessment was carried out by 25 semi-trained panelists. Based on the results of the study that substitution of basic feed with fermented non-conventional feed in rations on consumption acceptability including aroma, taste, tenderness, juiceness and texture can maintain the sensory quality of broiler chicken meat.


 


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggraeni, Elis Dihansih, Deden Sudrajat, & Renaldi, A. (2023). PENGGUNAAN PAKAN NON KONVENSIONAL TERFERMENTASI DALAM RANSUM TERHADAP NILAI ORGANOLEPTIK DAGING AYAM BROILER: THE USE FERMENTED NON CONVENTIONAL FEED IN RATIONSON THE ORGANOLEPTICS VALUE OF BROILER MEAT. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 9(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.30997/jpn.v9i1.8351
Section
Articles

References

Anggriani AN,Pujaningsih RI, Sumarsih S. 2019. Pengaruh Perbedaan Metode Pengolahan dan Level Pemberian Ekstrak Daun Kersen (Muntingia calabura L.)terhadap Kualitas Organoleptik Tepung Ikan Rucah. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 14(3): 282 – 291.

Asmara AS, Zuki AB, Mohd B, Hair, Awang-Hazmi AI. 2006. Gross and HistolologicalEvaluation of Fresh Chicken Carcass: Comparison Between Slaughtered and Cervical Dislocated Methods. Journal of Journal of Animal Science 79 (6): 1502-1508.

Euis TM, Roostita LB, Yuli AH. 2012. Uji Organoleptik Daging Ayam Broiler Yang Diberi Ransum Yang Mengandung Lumpur Susu Terfermentasi Aspergillus Niger. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Padjajaran.Vol. 12,No. 1.

Haryati T, Togatorop MH, Sinurat AP, Purwadaria T, Murtiyeni. 2006. Pemanfaatan bungkil kelapa fermentasi dengan A. Niger dalam ransum ayam pedaging. JITV 11(3): 182-190.

Komariah, II. Arief, Wiguna Y. 2004. Kualitas Fisik dan Mikrobia Daging Sapi Yang Ditambah Jahe (Zinger Officinaleroecoe) Pada Konsentrasi dan Lama Penyimpanan Yang Berbeda. Media Peternakan Vol. 28(2) : 38 – 87.

Lawrie RA. 2003. Ilmu Daging edisi ke-5. Penterjemah Aminudin Parrakasi. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Lean ME. 2013. Ilmu Pangan Gizi & Kesehatan Edisi ke 7. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Lyon CE. 2001. Effect Of Age, Sex and Duration Of Postmortem Aging On Percentage Yield Of Parts From Broiler Chicken Carcasses. Poultry Sci. 80(3). Hlm.376 – 379.

Matitaputty PR, Suryana. 2010. Karakteristik Daging Itik dan Permasalahan serta Upaya Pencegahan Off-flavor. WARTAZOA Vol 20(3).

Muhtadi D. 2013. Prinsip Teknologi Pangan Sumber Protein. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Mulyani S, Pramono YB, Hermawan AD. 2022. Perbedaan Karakteristik Fisik dan Mutu Hedonik Daging Ayam Pejantan dengan Metode Perebusan yang Berbeda. Jurnal tehnologi Pangan. 6(2)49-52.

Nugraheni M. 2012. Pengetahuan Bahan Pangan Hewani. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Pasaribu T, Sinuart AP, Purwadaria T, Supriyati, Hamid H. 1998. Peningkatan nilai gizi lumpur sawit melalui proses fermentasi: Pengaruh jenis kapang, suhu dan lama proses enzimatis. JITV 3(4): 237 – 242.

Pomanto RM, Dali FA, Mile L. 2016. Uji organoleptik tepung ikan manggabai (Glossogobius giuris) yang direndam dengan larutan asam alami. J. Ilmiah Argosains Tropis. 9 (3): 195-199.

Risnajati, Dede. 2010. Pengaruh lama penyimpanan dalam lemari es terhadap ph, daya ikat air,dan susut masak karkas broiler yang dikemas plastik polyethylen. J Ilmu Peternakan. 13 (6): 309-315.

Sandra DP, Elis D, Anggraeni. 2017. Substitusi Pakan Dasar Dengan Pakan Non Konvensional Terfermentasi Dalam Ransum Terhadap Kualitas Fisik Daging Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Djuanda. Bogor. Vol. 4,No 2.

Soeparno. 2005. Ilmu dan Teknologi Daging. Ed ke-4. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press Yogyakarta.

Supriyati T, Pasaribu, Hamid H, Sinurat AP. 1998. Fermentasi bungkil inti sawit secara substrat dengan menggunakan Aspergillus niger. J. Ilmu Ternak Vct. 2(3): 165-170.

Susetyo S. 1969. Padang Penggembalaan, Departemen IImu Ternak. Fakultas Peternakan. Bogor. 66 - 67.

Winarno FG. 2002. Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Yudistira. 2005. Mengenali daging sehat. Balipost [Internet]. [Diunduh 2007 Des25]. Tersedia pada: http:// www.balipost.co.id/ BaliPostcetak/2005/10/10/l3.