DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA

Authors

  • Ilman Khairi Lecturer of Law Faculty of Djuanda University, Bogor
  • Martin Roestamy Lecturer in law masters of Djuanda University Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v3i2.960

Keywords:

Droit De Preference, UMKM, Shops, Tanah Abang

Abstract

Use Rights Certificate Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of the right to use business premises (shop) in a market that is owned by market traders. SHPTU have a fairly high economic value. Therefore expected SHPTU can be used as loan collateral. SHPTU have a common element of the lease, as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. Because SHPTU not the right material, then SHPTU can not be guaranteed by using a material guarantee institutions. This thesis research methods with the added element of normative juridical empirical, with the analysis of qualitative data. From the analysis it can be concluded that SHPTU not the right material, but given SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred, it is expected that the government can immediately respond to the needs of society (the Merchants Market) to the existence of a guarantee institution which can accommodate SHPTU shop as loan collateral. Resulting from the rigidity of the legal material to deliver the right material on business premises or SHPTU recommended for use kaedah contained in Article 48-49 of the legislation Flats by issuing Certificates of Building Owners and Building (SKBG), where the issuance of the certificate is the same between Local government in this case the Department of Public Works and the Department of Housing, while still managing PD Pasar Jaya as it has been running for this. Issuing authority on the issuance of a certificate is not PD Pasar Jaya but agency in charge of publishing the SKBG. When referring to the Building Act SKBG publishing at the Department of Public Works, and when referring to the Law on Housing, the publishing SKBG by the Department of Housing. That way it is assured of legal certainty as mandated by state law, as well as the grand theory of Hans Kelsen. SKBG is way out proof of ownership of the store, which is very expensive because of the value it needs the necessary legal certainty regarding the right material.

References

C. R. Noyes, 1936, The Institution of Property, New York.
Djuhaendah Hasan, 1996, Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah Dan Benda Lain Yang Melekat Pada Tanah Dalam Konsepsi Penerapan Asas Pemisahan Horisontal: Suatu Konsep Dalam Menyongsong Lahirnya Lembaga Hak Tanggungan (Citra Aditya Bakti).
Frieda Husni Hasbullah, 2005, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata: Hak-Hak yang Memberi Kenikmatan.
J. Satrio, 1999, Perikatan Pada Umumnya, Bandung : Alumni.
Jimly Asshidiqie dan Ali Safa`at, 2006, Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Jakarta, Sekjen dan Kepaniteraan MK-RI.
Lawrence M. Friedmann, American Law, W.W Norton dan Company: New York London, 1984.
Lili Rasjidi dan Ida Bagus Wiyasa Putra, 2003, Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem, Penerbit: CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2006, Pembahasan, Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Edisi Kedua, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 1983, Mencari Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional, Alumni: Bandung.
Martin Roestamy, 2009, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia (Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Benda tidak Terdaftar), Bogor UNIDA Press.
Martin Roestamy, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia (Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Benda tidak Terdaftar), Bogor UNIDA Press, 2009.
Martin Roestamy, 2008, Kepastian Hukum Atas Kepemilikan Rumah Dan Bangunan Gedung Oleh Investor Asing Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Nasionalitas Dalam Sistem Huum Pertanahan Indonesia, yang dipertahankan dalam sidang terbuka, di Universitas Padjadjaran.
Martin Roestamy, 2015, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Bahan Matakuliah MPH, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Djuanda Bogor.
Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, 2002, Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan (Kumpulan Karya Tulis) Penerbit Alumni, Bandung.
Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional, Penerbit Bina Cipta, Bandung, tanpa tahun.
Philipus M. Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Indonesia, Jakarta : Bina Ilmu.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 1984, .Hukum dan Masyarakat, Angkasa: Bandung.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Menggagas Hukum Progresif Indonesia, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan, Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Winahyu Erwiningsih, 2009, Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Tanah, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum Program Pascasarjana, Total Media.

http://www.jualsewakios.com/tag/tanah-abang/, diakses pada tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Hadi Wijaya, http://www.telingamata.com/kios-di-tanah-abang-lebih-mahal-dari-tokyo-dan-new-york/ di akses pada tanggal 14 Agustus 2016
http://www.apartemensingapore.info/cara-membeli-apartemen-di-singapura/#.WKD-qvlyfDc diakses pada tahun 2014 Huttons Asia Pte Ltd
Wawancara pada hari Kamis, tanggal 15 September 2016, di Bank BRI Cabang Cut Mutia Jakarta, staf administrasi kredit, Dani Suhendro, SE.

Published

2018-01-24

How to Cite

Khairi, I., & Roestamy, M. (2018). DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA. Jurnal Hukum DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 3(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v3i2.960
Abstract viewed = 221 times