Pengembangan Instrumen Lingkungan Pembelajaran Hots Berdasarkan Preferensi siswa SD/MI
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian secara umum menghasilkan model lingkungan pembelajaran higher order thinking berdasarkan preferensi siswa tingkat SD. Secara khusus penelitian bertujuan: 1) Menyusun dan mengembangkan inventori lingkungan pembelajaran HOT berdasarkan preferensi siswa tingkat SD, 2) Mengembangkan model lingkungan pembelajaran HOT berdasarkan preferensi siswa tingkat SD. Metode penelitian pada tahun pertama dilakukan dengan metode research and development (R&D) model Borg & Gall. Uji coba instrumen dilakukan di Kabupaten/Kota Bogor dengan melakukan uji terbatas dengan sampel 73 siswa di 7 sekolah (SD dan MI). Hasil Uji Coba terbatas menunjukan bahwa 55 butir instrumen Lingkungan Pembelajaran Higher Order Thinking Berdasarkan Preferensi Siswa Tingkat MI/SD dapat dikatakan valid dengan rhitung lebih besar dari rtabel yaitu 0,203. Kemudian, berdasarkan hasil uji reliabilitas menunjukan nilai Cronbach's Alpha sebesar 0,958. Artinya intrumen yang dikembangkan dapat dinayatakn realibel/ konsisten. Oleh sebab itu, Instrumen yang dikembangkan dalam peneleitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai instrumen penelitian untuk mengukur lingkungan pembelajaran berfikir tingkat tinggi di tingkat sekolah dasar.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Tadbir Muwahhid agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Tadbir Muwahhid.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Tadbir Muwahhid.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, editors. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2010. 434 p.
Asok D, Abirami AM, Angeline CV N, Lavanya R. Active Learning Environment for Achieving Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Engineering Education. In: Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education, MITE 2016. 2017. p. 47–53.
Arifin Z, Retnawati H. Developing an Instrument to Measure Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills of 10th Grade Student in Senior High School. PYTHAGORAS J Pendidik Mat [Internet]. 2017;12(1):98–108. Available from: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/14058
Anderson GJ, Walberg HJ. Classroom Climate and Group Learning. In: Report. 1967. p. 14.
Anderson GJ, Walberg HJ, Welch WW. Curriculum Effects on the Social Climate of Learning: A New Representation of Discriminant Functions. Am Educ Res J. 1969;6(3):315–28.
Bell S. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. Clear House A J Educ Strateg Issues Ideas. 2010;83(2):39–43.
Brookhart SM. How To Assess HOTS In Your Classroom. Alexandria: ASCD; 2010. 1–160 p.
Brown T, Williams B, Lynch M. The Australian DREEM: evaluating student perceptions of academic learning environments within eight health science courses. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:94–101.
Doolen J. Psychometric Properties of The Simulation Thinking Rubric to Measure Higher Order Thinking in Undergraduate Nursing Students. Clin Simul Nurs [Internet]. 2015;11(1):35–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.10.007
Ennis RH. Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research. Educ Res. 1989;18(3):4–10.
Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Educational Research: An Introduction. Ketujuh. PearsonEducation, Inc. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2003
Hartini H, Sukardjo S. Pengembangan Higher Order Thinking Multiple Choice Test Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis IPA Kelas VII SMP/MTs. J Inov Pendidik IPA. 2015;1(1):86
Lai ER. Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson. 2011.
Mahoney JW, Harris-Reeves B. The Effects of Collaborative Testing on Higher Order Thinking: Do the Bright Get Brighter? Act Learn High Educ. 2017;20(1):25–37.
Ramos JLS, Dolipas BB, Villamor BB. Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students : A Regression Analysis. 2013;(4):48–60.
Saregar A, Latifah S, Sari M. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran CUPs: Dampak Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik Madrasah Aliyah Mathla’ul Anwar Gisting Lampung. J Ilm Pendidik Fis Al-Biruni. 2016;5(2):233–43.
Scully D. Constructing Multiple-Choice Items to Measure Higher-Order Thinking. Pract Assessment, Res Eval. 2017;22(4):1–13.
Setiawati W, Asmira O, Ariyana Y, Bestary R, Pudjiastuti A. Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakarta: Direktorak Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kemdikbud; 2018. 33 p.
Sternberg RJ. Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement and Improvement. Natl Inst Educ Washington, DC. 1986;37.
Tajularipin S, Muniyan V, Diwiyah M, Raidah H, Rahim SSA. Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching Of Science: A Case Study in Malaysia. Int Res J Educ Sci [Internet]. 2017;1(1):1–3. Available from: www.masree.info Manuscript