Main Article Content

Agrissto Bintang Aji Pradana


This study aims to describe the application of English language learning based on Multiple Intelligence Theory on the type of linguistic intelligence and student responses in following the learning of English. This research is a descriptive research, conducted in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Muhammadiyah Special Program Kartasura. Respondents in this study were principals, English language teachers, and 34 students. Data were collected through interview (semi-structured interview), observation, and questionnaire. Data were analyzed by step (1) data reduction; (2) data display; (3) verification. The results revealed that the students as a whole showed a positive response to the learning activities. As many as 88.2% of students have motivation to participate in learning activities, 82% interested in the material, and 79% like English subjects. In conclusion that students showed high intensity of physical motion almost resembles the characteristics of students with kinesthetic and naturalistic types and apply different concepts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pradana, A. B. A. (2018). ENGLISH LEARNING BASED ON MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE IN TYPE OF LINGUISTIC INTELLIGENCE. DIDAKTIKA TAUHIDI: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.30997/dt.v5i1.1110
Author Biography

Agrissto Bintang Aji Pradana, Muhammadiyah University of Magelang

Department of Elementary School Teacher Education


Abbas, M., & Khurshid, F. (2013). Motivational Techniques and Learners ’Academic Achievement at Primary Level. Global Journal of Human-Social …, 13(3). Retrieved from http://www.socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/600

Ahmad, A. R., Seman, A. A., Awang, M. M., & Sulaiman, F. (2014). Application of Multiple Intelligence Theory to Increase Student Motivation in Learning History. Asian Culture and History, 7(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v7n1p210

Armstrong, T. (2003). The Multiple Intelligences of Reading and Writing (Vol. 5). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Atta, M. A., & Jamil, A. (2012). Effects of motivation and parental influence on the educational attainments of students at secondary level. Academic Research International, 2(3), 427–431. Retrieved from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.2(3)/2012(2.3-52).pdf

Basheer Nomass, B. (2013). The Impact of Using Technology in Teaching English as a Second Language. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v3n1p111

Demirci Assoc, C. (2017). The Effect of Active Learning Approach on Attitudes of 7 th Grade Students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(104), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1048a

Derakhshan, A., & Faribi, M. (2015). Multiple Intelligences: Language Learning and Teaching. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(4), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n4p63

Fayazi-Nasab, E., & Ghafournia, N. (2016). The Relationship between Multiple Intelligences and Motivational Strategies. English Linguistics Research, 5(2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v5n2p20

Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. A Reader. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframe. New York: Basic Books.
Hajhashemi, K., Ghombavani, F., & Amirkhiz, S. (2011). The Relationship between Iranian EFL High School Students’ Multiple Intelligence Scores and their Use of Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p214

Hanh, L. T. T., & Tien, T. B. (2017). Multiple Intelligences-Based Homework and EFL Students’ Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n6p73

Madkour, M., & Mohamed, R. A. A. M. (2016). Identifying College Students’ Multiple Intelligences to Enhance Motivation and Language Proficiency. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 92. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p92

Maria Abdullah, G. J. (2004). Promoting Cooperative Learning at Primary School. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej28/ej28a1/

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis : An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Rahimi, M., Sadighi, F., & Hosseiny Fard, Z. (2012). The impact of linguistic and emotional intelligence on the reading performance of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 30(1), 151–171.

Shakouri, N., Sheikhy Behdani, R., & Teimourtash, M. (2016). On the relationship between linguistic intelligence and recalling lexical items in SLA. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2016.1644

Sulaiman, S., & Sulaiman, T. (2010). Enhancing Language Teaching and Learning by Keeping Individual Differences in Perspective. International Education Studies, 3(2), p134. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n2p134

Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2012). Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Uysal, N. D., & Yavuz, F. (2015). Teaching English to Very Young Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.042

Vakili, L. (2013). The Relationship between Linguistic Intelligence and L2 Learning Strategies among EFL Learners with Intermediate Level of Proficiency, 1, 89–93.

Younas, M., Subhani, A., & Akram, H. (2015). English Language Learning : A Role of Multiple Intelligence. English for Specific Purposes World, (46).