MODERASI KEDEKATAN SUPERIOR DAN SUBORDINAT PADA PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN TERHADAP SENJANGAN ANGGARAN DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KINERJA MANAJERIAL

Main Article Content

Farizka Susandra
Mas Nur Mukmin
Warizal Warizal

Abstract

This study examines the proximity factor between the superior  and subordinate as a moderating variable that is expected to moderate the relationship of budgetary participation and slack on the local government budget in order to improve managerial performance. The data used in this study is the primary data. Data collection using questionnaires and in-depth interviews with related parties. Respondents of this research are department heads in SKPD located in Bogor City. The sample was 71 respondents. Budgetary participation, budgetary slack, managerial performance, and superior proximity and subordinates in analysis using SEM PLS with WARP-PLS 6.0 software. The results of this study indicate the performance and budget participation has a positive relationship. Budget slack may be able to mediate the relationship with the budget with a 0.05 significance. In addition, there are interesting findings that high-level subordinate relationships can increase budget participation and reduce budgetary slack, while low-level subordination relationships can reduce the level of budget participation and increase budgetary constraints. As per the statistics that the Exchange Member Theory of proximity or subordinates can moderate the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack to improve managerial performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Susandra, F., Mukmin, M. N., & Warizal, W. (2021). MODERASI KEDEKATAN SUPERIOR DAN SUBORDINAT PADA PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN TERHADAP SENJANGAN ANGGARAN DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KINERJA MANAJERIAL. JURNAL AKUNIDA, 7(1), 30–43. Retrieved from https://ojs.unida.ac.id/JAKD/article/view/63
Section
Articles

References

Adler, R. W. dan J. Reid. 2008. The effects of leadership style and budget participation on job satisfaction and job performance. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Vol. 3, No. 1, 21-46.

Agyris,C. 1952. The impacts of budgets on people. New York: Financial Excecutive Foundations, 1-32. Ithaca: School of Business And Administration, Cornel University.

Baiman,S., dan Evans III, J.H. 1983. Pre-Decison information anda participative management control systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 21 (Autumn), 371-395.

Brownell, P. and M. McInnes. 1986. Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. The Accounting Review Vol. 61, No. 4, 587-612.

Cooper, D. R. and P. S. Schindler. 2008. Business research methods (10th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Dunk, A.S. 1993. The effect of budget emphasis and information asymetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. The Accounting Review Vol, 68 pp.400-410.

Ferdinand, A. 2006. Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Fiedler, F. E. 1967. A theory of leadership eflectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ghozali, I. 2008. Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Graen, G.B. 1976. Role making processes within complex organizations. In M.D Dunnette. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 1201-1245. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Graen, G.B., Novak, M., dan Sommerkamp, P. 1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-l 3 1.

Graen, G. B. and M. Uhl-Bien. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years: applying of multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6, 219-247.

Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2013. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE

Handoko, T. H. 2009. Manajemen: Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Jogiyanto, H. 2011. Konsep dan aplikasi structural equation modeling berbasis varian dalam penelitian bisnis. Yogyakarta: STIM YKPN.

Husain, Walidun. 2011. Pengaruh partisipasi pejabat struktural dalam penyusunan anggaran terhadap senjangan anggaran dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel moderating (Studi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Propinsi Gorontalo). Tidak dipublikasikan.

Ikhsan, Arfan dan Ane, L. 2007. Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap senjangan anggaran dengan menggunakan lima variabel pemoderasi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, Makassar.

Indriantoro, N. dan B. Supomo. 1998. Pengaruh struktur dan kultur organisasi terhadap keefektifan partisipasi anggaran dalam peningkatan kinerja manajerial: Studi empiris perusahaan manufaktur. Yogyakarta.

Karsam .2015. Effect of budget emphasis and motivation on the relationship between participative budgeting and budgetary slack and the impact on the managerial performance (A Study on Yayasan Pendidikan Dan Koperasi in the Banten Province). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting Vol.6, No.1.

Kartika, Andi. 2010. Pengaruh komitmen organisasi dan ketidakpastian lingkungan dalam hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dengan senjangan anggaran (Studi Empirik pada Rumah Sakit Swasta di Kota Semarang). Kajian Akuntansi Volume 2, Nomor 1. Halaman 39 – 60.

Lowe, E. A. dan R. W. Shaw. 1968. An analysis of managerial biasing: Evidence from a company’s budgeting process. The Journal of Management Studies, Volume 5.

Lussier, Robert N. and Christopher F. Achua. 2001. Leadership: theory, application, skill building. South-Western: College Pub.

Mahadewi, A.A. Sagung S. 2014. Pengaruh partisipasi penganggaran pada senjangan anggaran dengan asimetri informasi dan komitmen organisasi sebagai pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 8.3 pp.458-473.

Mahoney ,T., T. H. Jerdee, and S. J. Carroll. 1963. Development of managerial performance: A research approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.

Milani, K. 1975. Budget-setting, performance and attitudes. The Accounting Review 50, 274–284.

Mulyadi. 2001. Akuntansi manajemen: Konsep, manfaat dan rekayasa, edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.

Naranjo, Gil D. dan Gillabert, Carreras M. 2014. Trust in superiors and dysfunctional behaviors: An experimental study on budgetary slack. Journal of Positive Management Vol. 5, No.1 pp. 54-66.

Onsi, Muhamed. 1973. Factor analysis of behavioral variables affecting budgetary slack. The Accounting Review.

Rachman, Andry A. 2012. The influence of budgetary participation on budgetary slack: The role of organizational fairness, managerial trust, and budget goal commitment. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research.

Ramdeen, Collin, et al. 2007. An examination of impact of budgetary participation, budget emphasis, and information asymmetry on budgetary slack in the Hotel Industry. Article, William F. Harrah of College of Hotel Administration University of Nevada. Las Vegas.

Robbins, S. P. 2003. Perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Scandura, T., G. Graen, and M. A. Novak. 1986. When managers decide not to decide autocratically: an investigation of leader member exchange and decision influence. Journal of applied psychology.

Schiff, M., dan A.Y. Lewin. 1970. The impact of people on budgets. The Accounting Review, April pp. 259-267.

Sekaran, U. 2001. Research methods for business (3rd ed). New York: John Willey and Son, Inc.

Sholihin, Mahfud dan Dwi Ratmono. 2013. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan warpPLS 3.0: Untuk hubungan nonlinier dalam penelitian sosial dan bisnis. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Stoner, J. A. F., R. E. Freeman, and D. R. Gilbert. 1992. Management (5th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Susandra, Farizka. 2015. Analisis pengaruh leader member exchange (LMX) terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran, kinerja manajerial, dan kepuasan kerja. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Tidak dipublikasikan.

Truckenbrodt, Yolanda B. 2000. The relationship between leader-member exchange and commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Research acquisition review quarterly pp.233-244.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>