PERFORMA BROILER STRAIN CP 707 DAN STRAIN MANGGIS (AM 888) YANG DIPELIHARA PADA KANDANG POSTAL DOUBLE DECK SISTEM SEMI-CLOSE HOUSE PERFORMANCE OF BROILER STRAIN CP 707 AND MANGOSTEEN STRAIN (AM 888) MAINTAINED IN POSTAL DOUBLE DECK CAGES OF SEMI-CLOSE HOUSE SYSTEM
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Broiler strains are breeding results produced by breeding farms for certain economical purposes. Each type of broiler strain certainly has different advantages, so it will have an impact on the resulting performance. This study aims to determine the performance of broiler strain CP 707 and mangosteen strain (AM 888) which are kept in postal double deck cages with a semi-close house system. The materials in this study are broiler strain CP 707 and mangosteen strain (AM 888) which are raised in postal double deck cages with a semi-close house system, a population of 22,000 heads / cage and commercial feed types SB 8108 and TOP 8118 P. This research was carried out for 21 days on the broiler farm of Mr. Rahmatullah Rosidin Galih B and C with a double deck postal cage type in Kidin Village, Kibin District, Serang Regency, Banten. The method used in this study is survey and observation (direct observation in the field) to retrieve data related to broiler performance. The variables observed in this study were feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and depletion. The data obtained are analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the performance of broiler strain CP 707 was better than the mangosteen strain (AM 888). This is because broilers of the CP 707 strain are obtained the amount of feed intake, higher body weight gain, as well as a lower feed conversion ratio (FCR) and depletion rate compared to broilers of the mangosteen strain (AM 888).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Adeyinka. O, Oni, Nwagu. B. 2006. Genetic Parameter Estimates Of Body Weights Of Naked Neck Broiler Chickens. International journal of poultry science. 5(6): 589-592.
Alam S. 2018. Terampil Mengoperasikan Broiler Closed House. Infovet Majalah Peternakan dan Kesehatan. www.majalahinfovet.com. Diakses 03 Mei 2023.
Arum, K.T., E.R. Cahyadi., A. Basith. 2017. Evaluasi Kinerja Peternak Mitra Ayam Ras Pedaging. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Ternak 5(2): 78-83.
Aryanti, F., M.B. Aji, dan N. Budiono. 2013. Pengaruh pemberian gula merah terhadap peforma ayam kampung pedaging. Jurnal veteriner 31(2): 156-164.
BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). 2022. Statistik indonesia 2022. https:www.bps.go.id/publication/2022 /02/25/0a2afea4fab72a5d052cb315/satistik-indonesia-2022.html.
Corzo, A., Moran Jr, E.T., Hoehler, D. 2002. Lysine need of heavy broiler males applying the ideal protein concept. Poult. Sci. 81: 1863-1868.
Fatmaningsih, R., Riyanti, R., & Nova, K. 2016. Performa Ayam Pedaging Pada Sistem Brooding Konvensional Dan Thermos. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu 4(3).
Irwan, F., M. J. Wattiheluw, & A. H. Tulalessy. 2022. Performa Broiler Yang Dipelihara Pada Kandang Panggung Dan Postal Double Deck Dengan Sistem Close House. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 7(12)
Karang, I.G.I. 2017. Analisis Performa Produksi dan Pendapatan Peternak Ayam Broiler dengan Sistem Pemeliharaan Closed House pada Pola Kemitraan. Skripsi. Sarjana Peternakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.
Lin H, H. C. Jiao, J. Buyse, dan E. Decuyper. 2006. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. World’s Poult. Sci, 62, 71-85.M
Marom, A.T., U. Kalsum, dan U. Ali. 2017. Evaluasi performani broiler pada sistem kandang close house dan open house dengan altitude berbeda. Dinamika Rekasatwa 2 (2): 1-10.
Nadzir., A. Tusi, A. Haryanto. 2015. Evaluasi kandang ayam broiler di desa Rejobinangun, kecamatan Raman Utara, kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung 4 (4): 255-266.
Nuryanti, T. 2019. Analisis Performans Ayam Broiler pada Kandang Tertutup dan Kandang Terbuka. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara 5 (2): 77-86.
Petrawati. 2003. Pengaruh Unsur Mikro Kandang Terhadap Jumlah Konsumsi Pakan Dan Bobot Badan Ayam Broiler di Dua Ketinggian Tempat Berbeda. Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Institut Pertanian..Bogor.
PT Charoen Pokhphand Indonesia. Tbk. 2006. Manual Broiler Manajemen CP 707. Jakarta.
Purwantoro D. 2015. Tingkatkan Produksi Broiler dengan Cara Modern (Closed House). Dhanangclosed house.com/tingkatkan-produksi-broilerdengan-cara-moden. Diakses 03 Mei 2023.
Qurniawan, A. , Irma Isnafia , A., A., Rudi. 2016. Performans Produksi Ayam Pedaging pada Lingkungan Pemeliharaan dengan Ketinggian yang Berbeda di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Veteriner 17(4): 622-633.
Ramadhani, R.A. 2016. Korelasi antara tingkat deplesi terhadap bobot panen, pertambahan bobot badan, konsumsi pakan, dan FCR pada ayam pedaging. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Risnajati, D. 2012. Perbandingan Boot Akhir, Bobot Karkas dan Persentase Karkas Berbagai Strain Broiler. Sains Peternakan. Vol. 10 (1).
Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). 2017. Pakan Ayam Pedaging (Broiler). Direktorat Pakan. Repositori Publikasi. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. http://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle /123456789/6476. Diakses: 15 Januari 2023.
Subkhie, H., Suryahadi., dan A. Saleh. 2012. Analisis kelayakan usaha peternakan ayam pedaging dengan pola kemitraan di Kecamatan Ciampea Kabupaten Bogor. Manajemen IKM 7(1): 54- 63.
Susanto, H., Herawati, M., & Rastosari, A. 2019. Pengaruh Perlakuan Sexing terhadap Konsumsi Pakan, Pertambahan Berat Badan dan Konversi Pakan Ayam Ras Pedaging di Kandang Semi Closed House. Jurnal Wahana Peternakan, 3(1): 26-33.
Susanti, E.D., M. Dahlan, dan D. Wahyuning. 2016. Perbandingan Produktivitas Ayam Broiler Terhadap Sistem Kandang Terbuka (Open House) dan Kandang Tertutup (Closed House) di UD Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumberejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ternak. 7(1).
Tamalluddin, F. 2018. Panduan Praktis Panen Broiler 3 Minggu. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Tantalo, S. 2009. Perbandingan performans dua strain broiler yang mengonsumsi air kunyit. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 3(12).
Umam, M. K., H.S. Prayogi, dan V.M.A. Nurgiartiningsih. 2014. Penampilan Produksi Ayam Pedaging yang Dipelihara pada Sistem Lantai Kandang Panggung dan Kandang Bertingkat. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 24(3): 79-87
Umiarti, A.T. 2020. Mananjemen Pemeliharaan Broiler. Pustaka Laras. Denpasar, Bali.
Wahju, J. 2004. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta.
Widana, I.P.V., I.W. Sukanata, dan I.G.N. Kayana. 2019. Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler dengan Sistem Kandang Closed House (Studi Kasus di Pt.Ciomas Adisatwa, Desa Tuwed, Jembrana, Bali). Ejournal Peternakan Tropika 7(2): 676-694.
Wijayanti, R.P. 2011. Pengaruh Suhu Kandang yang Berbeda terhadap Performans Ayam Pedaging Periode Starter. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Yerpes M, Llonch P, Manteca X. 2020. Factors associated with cumulative first- week mortality in broiler chicks. Animals. 10:1–13.