Focus and Scope |
Editorial Board |
Reviewer Team |
Abstracting and Indexing |
letter of originality |
Contact Person |
A. Submission checklist
-All manuscript and supplementary material files have been uploaded.
-Author names and their affiliations have been provided.
-One author has been designated as the corresponding author.
-The manuscript title is short and informative.
-The abstract can be read as stand-alone text and does not exceed 250 words.
-The manuscript file contains all essential sections (the order can vary): Title, Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Implication, References.
-The manuscript has been checked for spelling and grammar (if the manuscript is in English).
-All references mentioned in the References list are cited in the text, and vice versa.
-All necessary declarations have been made.
-Attach a statement of originality of the article (Statement originality) and proof of the similarity test.
B. STRUCTURE OF THE MANUSCRIPT
Example of article structure :
Subdivision - numbered sections
Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Use this numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line.
The introduction should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight why it is important. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance. The current state of the research field should be reviewed carefully and key publications cited. Please highlight controversial and diverging hypotheses when necessary. Finally, briefly mention the main aim of the work and highlight the principal conclusions. As far as possible, please keep the introduction comprehensible to scientists outside your particular field of research. References should be cited as (Robo (2014), (Skidmore, 2004; McConkey & Mariga, 2011; Rose & Howley, 2007), (Anders et al., 2011). See the end of the document for further details on references.
1.1. Sub Heading 1
Online learning emphasizes Internet-based courses offered synchronously and asynchronously. Synchronous is a form of learning with direct interactions between students and teachers at the same time using online forms such as conferences and online chat.
1.1.1. Sub Heading 2
The transition of instructional methods that have been through face-to-face directly in schools forces the school to follow the flow so that learning can take place with complex limitations.
Methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate and build on published results. Please note that publication of your manuscript implicates that you must make all materials, data, computer code, and protocols associated with the publication available to readers. Please disclose at the submission stage any restrictions on the availability of materials or information. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited.Research manuscripts reporting large datasets that are deposited in a publicly available database should specify where the data have been deposited and provide the relevant accession numbers. If the accession numbers have not yet been obtained at the time of submission, please state that they will be provided during review. They must be provided prior to publication.
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Result
Results section is provided prior to the discussion section. Each section stands alone as a subtitle. The findings and discussion should be written in not less than 60% of the entire body of the manuscript.
3.2. Discussion
The discussion section is intended to interpret the findings of the study in accordance with the theories used and not merely describe the founding. The discussion must be enriched by referring to the results of previous studies that have been published in scientific journals.
4. CONCLUSION
A conclusion is not merely a re-statement of the data or findings, but a synthesis of key points and, as mentioned in the “Introduction” which eventually produces the & quot; Results and Discussion & quot; chapter so that there is compatibility. In addition, the prospects for developing research results and the prospects for future research applications (based on results and discussion) can also be added.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This section displays authors appreciation to sponsors, fund donors, resource persons, or parties who have an important role in conducting research.
REFERENCES
List of References shall be arranged in alphabetical order of last name of first-named author for with more than one author. Do not number them. Please refer and follow the APA Style 7th ed (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html
For some examples:
Text Book
1. One editor
Mitchell, D. R. (2008). What really works in special and inclusive education: using evidence-based teaching strategies. London ; New York: Routledge.
2. Two or more editors
Armstrong, A. C., Armstrong, D., & Spandagou, I. (2010). Inclusive education: international policy and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
3. Book Section
Effendi, S. (1982). Unsur-unsur penelitian ilmiah. Dalam Masri, S (Ed.). Metode penelitian survei. Jakarta: LP3ES.
4. Online journal
Rohmah, I. (2017). Classroom Interaction in English Language Class for Students of Economics Education. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.14
5. Journal with 2 or more authors
Caldarella, P., Sabey, C. V., & Griffin, A. A. (2017). The effects of a buddy bench on elementary students solitary behavior during recess. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131884
6. Journal with six or more authors
Wolchik, S. A., West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J., Coatsworth, D., Lengua, L., et al. (2000). An experimental evaluation of theorybased mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 843-856.
7. National Newspaper
Nadhir, M. (2017, November 10). Kompas.com (if online, add the website address)
8. Tesis/Dissertation
Rasmitadila. (2015). Instructional Interaction in Inclusive Classrooms. Case Study Research at Al Fikri Junior High School Depok West Java. Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta.
Slamet Suyanto. (2009). The success of schools in national examinations is reviewed by learning organizations. Dissertation, not published. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
9. Abstract proceeding:
Paidi. The urgency of developing problem solving and metacognitive abilities of high school students through learning biology. Proceedings, Seminar and MIPA National Conference, 2008. Yogyakarta: FMIPA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
10. Internet
White H. 2007. Problem-based learning in introductory science across disciplines. Retrieved October 4, 1999 from http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/finalrpt.html.
11. Legal document
Minister of National Education Regulation Number 70, Year 2009 concerning Inclusive Education
Address:Universitas Djuanda Bogor Gedung Rektorat (A) Lantai 2 Rg LPPMJl Tol Ciawi No 1 , Kotak Pos 35, 16720
|
Contact Info:Nadia Amalia, S.I.Kom., MAP.Phone: 081286281933
Email: nadia.amalia080795@gmail.com Email: qh.lppm@unida.ac.id
|