TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA NOMOR 31/G/2011/PTUN-PBR BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KEUANGAN NEGARA

Authors

  • Kevin Fausta Zahran Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Siftiana Sariyatul Arzaqiyah Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Revo Handhika Juang Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v9i2.8484

Keywords:

Juridical Review, Administrative Court, State Financial Law

Abstract

This article will discuss the results of the judge's decision at the State Administrative Court Number 31/G/2011/PTUN-Pbr based on the perspective of state financial law. Administrative Court is a judicial institution that specifically handles legal disputes and relates to Administrative Court between the government and individuals or rechtspersoon. If there is a problem related to state finances, the Administrative Court tries to ensure that the dispute is resolved when a lawsuit is brought to the Administrative Court. The aim of this research is to find out the legal provisions related to the filing of a lawsuit in a state financial case to the Administrative Court and to understand the analysis related to the decision of the PTUN judge No. 31/G/2011/PTUN-Pbr based on the perspective of state financial law. This research is a normative legal research using a case approach and statutory approach. Sources of data were obtained through document and literature studies by collecting data and research sources through articles, journals and various other documents. The results of the study show that the decision Number: 31/G/2011/PTUN-Pbr is a disputed case decision regarding the TUN decision letter, which is also related to state finances.

References

Abdullah, Ujang. “Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Dua Tingkat Yang Lebih Efisien Dan Efektif” 6 (2004).

Article, Conceptual, Pengadilan Tata, and Usaha Negara. “Permasalahan Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Oleh Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Yunantyo Adi Setiawan Kantor Advokat YAS & Partner Unu Putra Herlambang Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia Abstrak Corresponding Author :” 6160, no. April (2022): 107–18.

Budianto, Valerie Augustine. Subjek Hukum yang Dapat Menggugat ke PTUN. Artikel Hukum Online. Online tersedia: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/subjek-hukum-yang-dapat-menggugat-ke-ptun-lt57183550b88c2. 2022. [Diakses 03 April 2023].

Dani, Umar. "Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction Atau Duality Of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya/Understanding Administrative Court In Indonesia: Unity Of Jurisdiction Or Duality Of Jurisdiction System? A Study Of Hierarchy And Characteristic." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 7, no. 3 (2018): 405-424.

Edukasi Keuangan. Mengenal Lebih Dekat Hukum Keuangan Negara. Artikel Nasional Edukasi Keuangan. Online tersedia : https://www.mag.co.id/hukum-keuangan-negara/. 2015. [Diakses 03 April 2023].

I Gede Buonsu, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Keputusan Fiktif Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Gugatan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 68–72.

Utama, Kartika Widya, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Kampus Undip, Administrasi Negara, Fiktif Positif, and A Pendahuluan. “Surat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 141-251–251.

Wahyudi, H. Yodi Martono. “Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Hukum, no. 5 (2007): 1–11.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

How to Cite

Kevin Fausta Zahran, Siftiana Sariyatul Arzaqiyah, & Revo Handhika Juang. (2023). TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA NOMOR 31/G/2011/PTUN-PBR BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KEUANGAN NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 9(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v9i2.8484
Abstract viewed = 21 times