Perlindungan Bagi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal

Authors

  • Yunita Maya Putri Universitas Lampung

Abstract

Protection of communal intellectual property rights is very important in Indonesia. Because communal intellectual property rights are not based on a "first serve" basis, where the first registrant or innovator is the first to acquire intellectual property. However, this method, because it is not always known when or who invented the concept or created a work for the first time. This research uses empirical normative method by examining regulations and field observations. There are 5 (five) regrets that this Communal Intellectual Property needs to be protected, namely in the context of realizing justice, protection (conservation), preservation (preservation), notification from other unauthorized parties who can carry out piracy (biopiracy) and the use of traditional culture. . The concept of protection of communal intellectual property rights with two models of protection that can be provided through defensive protection and positive protection. Defensive legal protection protection is to prevent other parties from taking over intellectual property rights as well as positive protection that is manifested in the form of legislation. 

References

Aguilar, Grethel. 2001. “Access to Genetic Resources and Protection of Traditional Knowledge in the Territories of Indigenous Peoples.” Environmental Science & Policy 4 (4): 241–56. www.elsevier.nl/locate/envsci.
Cullet, Philippe. 2006. “Human Rights , Knowledge and Intellectual Property Protection” 11 (January): 7–14.
Dagne, TW. 2010. “Law and Policy on Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Development: Legally Protecting Creativity and Collective Rights in Traditional Knowledge-Based.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1600293.
Gervais, DJ Daniel J. 2003. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis. sweet & maxwell.
GRAIN. 2000. “FOR A FULL REVIEW OF TRIPS 27.3(b) An Update on Where Developing Countries Stand with the Push to Patent Life at WTO GRAIN March 2000 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).” Barcelona. https://www.grain.org/article/entries/39-for-a-full-review-of-trips-27-3-b.
Josling, Tim. 2006. “The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (3): 337–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00075.x.
Marie-Vivien, Delphine. 2010. “The Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: From Disengagement in France/Europe to Significant Involvement in India.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 121–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00375.x.
Septiono, S. 2009. “Geographical Indication Protection and Indonesia’s Geographical Indication Potential.” Jakarta.
Sofyarto, Karlina. 2018. "Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Pengetahuan Tradisional Terhadap Perolehan Manfaat Ekonomi." Kanun Jurnal Imu Hukum.
South-East Asia IPR SME Helpdesk. 2016. “Intellectual Property and the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).” Ho Chi Min: EU. http://www.southeastasia-iprhelpdesk.eu/sites/default/files/publications/AEC-English.pdf.
UNESCO. 2014. “Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.” UNESCO DIgital Library. 2014. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230504.
Wierma Putri, Ria. 2015. “Protect Traditional Knowledge of Indigenous People with Geographical Indication.” Rule of Law and Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta. http://www.pusham.uii.ac.id/index.php?page=lstarticledl&lang=en&idx=120.
WTO. 2001. “WTO | Intellectual Property (TRIPS) - Reviews, Article 27.3b, Traditional Knowledge, Biodiversity - Background.” 2001. https://www.wto.org/english/
tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.htm.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-06

How to Cite

Putri, Y. M. (2021). Perlindungan Bagi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal. Jurnal Hukum DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 7(2), 173–184. Retrieved from https://ojs.unida.ac.id/LAW/article/view/4073
Abstract viewed = 433 times