THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF COMPENSATION FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT THAT CONTRARY TO LABOR LAW

Authors

  • Yusuf Randi Departemen Hukum Perdata, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v6i1.2581

Abstract

Humans as social creatures always work, either endeavored alone or work with others in meeting their needs, which then gave birth to work relationships. The working relationship in the journey does not always run harmoniously but there are often disputes that sometimes end with the termination of employment (PHK), as happened in the Supreme Court Decree No: 788k/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018, where the company laid off workers against and provide compensation for layoffs based on collective agreements and are not guided by the provisions of layoffs in Law No. 13 concerning Manpower.The method of approach used is normative juridical, with research specifications analytical descriptive. The results showed that the joint agreement applied by the Supreme Court Judge as a legal basis in resolving cases, defects an objective requirement that is violating the halal causal conditions, because it regulates layoff compensation whose value is not under the provisions of Article 156 paragraph (1), (2), (3) and (4) the Manpower Act, thus violating the legal conditions of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, therefore the agreement is invalid and has no legal force. Besides, the work period of workers with companies based on PKWT should legally change to PKWTT as stipulated in Article 59 paragraph (7) of the Manpower Act.

Keywords: Compensation,  Work termination, Joint Agreements.

References

Arief Sidharta, dan Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum : Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum, Buku I, Bandung: Alumni.

Asikin, Zainal dkk. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Charda S., Ujang. “Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Setelah Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004”, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Vol. 1, No. 1, Maret 2017.

Darus Badrulzaman, Mariam. 2015. Hukum Perikatan Dalam KUH Perdata Buku Ketiga (Yurisprudensi, Doktrin, Serta Penjelasan), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

https://buruh-online.com/2019/01/ma-dinilai-keliru-persamakan-perjanjian-bersama-seperti-putusan-pengadilan.htm. Diakses pada 5 Desember 2019.

Husni, Lalu. 2003. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Edisi Revisi, Cet. Ke-4, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo.

_____.2014. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

H. Manulang, Sedjun. 1995. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Khakim, Abdul. 2014. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Cet. Ke-4 Edisi Revisi, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. 2010. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Sebuah Sketsa), Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Mahkamah Agung RI. 2006.Pedoman Perilaku Hakim (Code Of Conduct), Kode Etik Hakim dan Makalah berkaitan, Jakarta: Pusdiklat MA RI.

Miru, Ahmadi. 2016. Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak , Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Nuroini, Indi. “Penerapan Perjanjian Bersama Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 8, No. 3, Desember 2015.

Pujiyo, dan Ugo. 2012. Hukum Acara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, (Tata Cara dan Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Perburuhan), Cet. Ke-2, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Subiandini Gultom, Sri. 2008. Aspek Hukum Hubungan Industrial, Jakarta: Inti Prima Promosindo.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial

Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Keputusan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor KEP.100/MEN/VI/2004 Tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Randi, Y. (2020). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF COMPENSATION FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT THAT CONTRARY TO LABOR LAW. Jurnal Hukum DE’RECHTSSTAAT, 6(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v6i1.2581
Abstract viewed = 194 times