APPOINTMENTS OFARBITERS IN INDONESIAN NATIONAL BOARD OF ARBITRATION IN CIVIL CASEBASED ON LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 30 OF 1999 CONCERNING ARBITRATION AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Ayi Nurjanah

Abstract

This study aims to find out application and effectiveness of Law no. 30 of 1999 on the Indonesian National Board of Arbitration (BANI) of South Jakarta, especially regarding the mechanism of its  implementation of arbitral tribunal elections and their impact on  settlement of arbitration dispute on the institution, and to know the obstacles that hinder the success of arbitration. This research is normative juridicial with the approach of legislation and analytical approach. Data collection techniques are field studies through interviews with related parties. Research data consist of primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained by direct interviews using structured interview guidelines. Meanwhile,, the secondary data obtained by reviewing documents and literature related to the object of research. Then such data is obtained and is analyzed qualitatively by explaining the problems as discussed in the thesis. From the results of the study, what can be concludedthat: (1) measures the election and appointment of arbitrators is proven effective due to its large impact on the settlement of the dispute so that it can be done more quickly than the general courts. (2) Based on the authority of the arbitrators,  an effortto implement Law No. 30 of 1999 has been well implemented as stipulated in the regulation, but there are still factors that hinder the success of arbitration to BANI  which come from the parties, arbitrator's inability, high cost of arbitration and public knowledge about unpopular arbitration institution.

Keywords

Arbitration, Arbiter, BANI, Legal Protection.

References

A. Buku

B.N Marbun, Kamus Hukumm Indonesia, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2009

Philipus M. Hadjon,Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1987.

H. Salim HS dan Budi Sutrisno,Hukum Investasi di Indoensia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012.

Huala Adolof, Arbitrase Komersiall Internasional, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1991.

M. Yahya Harahap, Arbitrase, Pustakaa Kartini, Jakarta,1991

Muhammad Nasir, Hukum Acara Perdata, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2005.

Rachmadi Usman, Mediasi dii Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.

St. Paul Minnesota, Black’s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co. 1991.

Susanti Adi Nugroho, Penyelesaiann Sengketa Arbitrase Dan Penerapann Hukumnya, Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta, 2015.

B. Perundang-undangan

Peraturan Prosedur Arbitrase BANI/Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945 (amandemen).

Undang-Undang RI No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Undang-Undang RI No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

C. Makalah

J. Djohansjah, Access to Justice (Makalah) . Disampaikan Pada Pelatihan HAM Bagi Jejaring Komisi Yudisial Bandung, 3 Juli 2010

Madjedi Hasan, Kode Etika Arbiter (Makalah), INDONESIA ARBITRATION - Vol. 7 No. 2 June 2015 Hlm . 15-16, newsletters BANI.

D. Sumber Internet

http://gatot-arbitrase.blogspot.co.id/2008/12/keuntungan-arbitrase.html Diakses Pada Tanggal 25 Juli 2017 Pk. 22:34:36 .

http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol13217/pembatalan-putusan-arbitrase-di- indonesia Diakses Tanggal 01/08/2017 Pukul 19:33:27

http://www.ilmuhukum.net/2015/09/teori-perlindungan-hukum-menurut para.html, Diakses Pada Tanggal : 07 Maret 2017 Pk. 14:53:42.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.