PRAPERADILAN ATAS PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DILUAR KETENTUAN KUHAP

Main Article Content

Rio Ramadhan Hutasuhut
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-3106
Aryo Fadlian

Abstract

The authority of the district court in examining and deciding whether or not the determination of a suspect is legal raises various pros and cons. As regulated in Article 1 Number 10 in conjunction with Article 77 KUHAP. Pre-trial is highlighted by the wider community, especially with the decision number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.JKT.Sel in the case of Police Commissioner General Budi Gunawan who at that time was fighting the Corruption Eradication Commission, a commission to eradicate corruption, there were findings a new law that makes reform of the criminal procedural law process in Indonesia. The method used is using normative juridical legal source research with a literature study of statutory regulations and using the decisions of the South Jakarta District Court. The author considers the judge who decides the pretrial petition case is not an object of pretrial authority. With legal findings by judges, it is deemed necessary to discuss pretrial powers and pretrial decisions that have binding legal force so that they must be implemented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hutasuhut, R. R., & Fadlian, A. (2021). PRAPERADILAN ATAS PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DILUAR KETENTUAN KUHAP. JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW, 13(2), 91–99. Retrieved from https://ojs.unida.ac.id/livinglaw/article/view/4240
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rio Ramadhan Hutasuhut, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Mahasiswa Konsentrasi Hukum Pidana Semester 7 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Aryo Fadlian, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

References

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Pengadilan Dalam Empat Lingkungan Peradilan, Buku II Edisi 2007, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2009.

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Peter Mahmud Marjuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2005.

Wirjono Projodikoro, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur Bandung, 1985.

S. Wulandari, Kajian Tentang Praperadilan dalam Hukum Pidana, UNTAG Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Volume 4 Nomor 3, 2015.

PO Tumian Lian Daya Purba, Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum bagi Tersangka, Papua Law Journal, Volume 1 Issue 2, 2017.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.

Putusan Nomor 65/PUU-IX/2011