IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS ARTICLE 7 PARAGRAPH 2 OF LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2012 CONCERNING CHILDREN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Main Article Content

Fransiska Novita Eleanora
Sri Wahyuni

Abstract

Children as successors to the ideals of the struggle of the nation must always be protected by the existence of their rights, including children who have legal obligations, meaning that the child if possible is not sentenced but is resolved by way of deliberation for consensus and a familial nature commonly referred to as diversion. . Settling this diversion so that children can be held responsible, remove the stamp or stigma attached to the child, and there is no sense of revenge between the perpetrator and the victim. But the obstacle in diversion is a crime committed by a child no more than 7 (seven) years and is not a repetition or recidivist, so the provisions of article 7 paragraph 2 are considered not to provide justice to children who have problems with the law, because the diversion must also ask the victim's agreement. , exceptions to the nature of minor criminal offenses, no victims, and losses suffered not exceeding the local minimum wage. The research method is normative juridical by reviewing literature and legislation relating to the problem under study, and the result is diversion prioritizing the best interests of children as perpetrators and victims in accordance with restorative justice and prioritizing children's rights to get justice in accordance with the protection of rights of child

Keywords: children, law, criminal, justice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Eleanora, F. N., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS ARTICLE 7 PARAGRAPH 2 OF LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2012 CONCERNING CHILDREN CRIMINAL JUSTICE. JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW, 12(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v12i1.2277
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Fransiska Novita Eleanora, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Fakultas Hukum

Sri Wahyuni, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Fakultas Hukum

References

E.Y. Kanter dan S.R. Sianturi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, cet. III, Jakarta: Storia Grafika
Harefa Beniharmoni, Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak, Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2016
Setya Wahyudi, Implementasi Ide Diversi Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2011
Sigit Angger Pramukti dan Fuady Primaharsha, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta, 2015
Soekanto, Soerjono & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (suatu tinjauan singkat), Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2001
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Kencana, Jakarta, 2005
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2010
Saraswati, Rika, Hukum Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2015
Gultom, Maidin, 2006, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2017
Nasir Djamil, Anak Tidak Boleh Dihukum, cetakan ke-2 Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2003
https://icjr.or.id/selamat-datang-tindak-pidana-diversi/”Selamat Datang Tindak Pidana Doversi” di akses, 10 Desember 2019, Jam, 7.14 wib
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak
Perraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak yang belum berumur 12 (dua belas) tahun.
Peraturan dari Mahkamah Agung dengan Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman dari Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak,