REVISI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 92 TAHUN 2015 TERHADAP KOMPONEN DAN BESARAN GANTI KERUGIAN

Rachmat Trijono

Abstract

Compensation in Article 77 KUHAP is regulated further PP No. 27 of 1983 has been amended PP No. 92 of 2015. Amount of compensation in PP No. 92 of 2015 has increased, however, the impression of injustice cannot be eliminated considering that in various instances the amount of compensation is not in accordance with the magnitude of the loss that actually occurred by the victim. The problem is policy of revised PP 92 of 2015 on components and the amount of compensation ideally. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the policy of revised PP 92 of 2015. This study used normative and sociological methods with qualitative approaches. This study used secondary and primary data. The results of the study: 1. The component of compensation: Returns to its original state; To bear the costs incurred to restore to its original state, in the form of serious injuries and minor injuries; Providing certain compensation in the event that it cannot be returned to its original state; Provide compensation for the loss of opportunity that should be obtained. 2. The amount of compensation is adjusted to the components. Recommended that the judge determine the amount of the loss, so the victim does not need to file a claim for compensation.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Campbell, Tom. “Prescriptive Legal Positivism_ Law, Rights and Democracy.” UCL Press, 2004.

Chahyadi, Muhammad. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Karena Salah Tangkap Dan Menahan Orang” (2015).

Creswell, John W. “Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2009, SAGE Publications, Inc).Pdf,” 2009.

Hamzah, Andi. “Laporan Naskah Akademik Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tentang Tata Cara Ganti Kerugian Akibat Kesalahan Penangkapan, Penahanan” (2005).

Haqulana, Mewan. “Kisah Korban Salah Tangkap, Dua Kaki Didor Oknum Polisi Sampai Pasrah Ingin Mati,” 2017.

https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/11/01/340/1806302/kisah-korban-salah-tangkap-dua-kaki-didor-oknum-polisi-sampai-pasrah-ingin-mati.

Indonesia. “Peraturan Pemerintah No . 27 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana” (1983).

———. “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 92 Tahun 2015 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana” (2015).

———. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman” (2009): 1–27.

———. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981tentang Hukum Acara Pidana,” no. 1 (1981).

Michael P. Oakes, Meng Ji, ed. Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies A Practical Guide to Descriptive Translation Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1996.

Musnaini. “Ganti Rugi Bagi Korban Salah Tangkap Atau Salah Tahan Dalam Qanun Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayah Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Islam” VI, no. 2 (2017): 232–251.

Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 2002.

Puspita, Sherly. “Kisah Korban Salah Tangkap Yang Disiksa Polisi,” 2017. http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2017/06/22/08572121/kisah.korban.salah.tangkap.yang.disiksa. polisi.

Utama, Abraham. “Kisah Kuswanto, Korban Salah Tangkap Yang Dibakar Polisi,” 2015. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150626090000-32-62513/kisah-kuswanto-korban-salah-tangkap-yang-dibakar-polisi.

Vartanian, Thomas P. Secondary Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2011.

VoA. “Kasus Salah Tangkap,” 2019. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/kasus-salah-tangkap-pria-california-dapat-ganti-rugi-21-miliar/4802643.html.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.