Evidence of Suspicion in Civil Procedure Law (Study analysis of the use of prejudice as a judge's consideration in decision NoMOR 10/PDT. G/2018/PN. END)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to dig deeper into the role of prejudice in the civil law system in Indonesia, by focusing on its definition, types, and impact on judges' decisions. This study specifically discusses the use of suspicion in Decision Number 10/Pdt.G/2018/PN. End, as a case that marks the importance of the role of allegations in resolving civil law disputes. Using normative juridical methods, this study elaborates and examines allegations based on provisions in Burgerlijk Wetboek and HIR, as well as paying attention to secondary legal materials to enrich discussion and analysis of related judicial practices. The findings of this study confirm that the allegation not only acts as prima facie evidence but also reverses the burden of proof that must be borne by those who deny it. This is evidenced by an analysis of the role of allegations in the case that is the focus of the study, showing that the judge has the flexibility to formulate allegations from the facts proven at trial. However, the allegation must meet the criteria set out in Article 173 HIR and Article 1922 of the Civil Code to be considered valid and adequate as evidence.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Benny, Benny, Finley Larissa Wilhelmina, Verina Tania Ruandi, and Sonya Airini Batubara, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Transaksi Online Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 7.1 (2020), 36–43 <https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v7i1.3668>
Djojorahardjo, Rommy Haryono, ‘Mewujudkan Aspek Keadilan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata’, Jurnal Media Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5.1 (2019), 88–100 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29062/jmhp.v5i1.79>
Effendie, Bachtiar, Masdari Tasmin, and A Chodari, Surat Gugat Dan Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Perdata (Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991)
Harahap, M Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan (Sinar Grafika, 2017)
Heriyanti, Yuli, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Bukti Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Perkara Perdatadalam Putusan Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard (N.O)( Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Bangkinang)’, Jurnal Pahlawan, 3.1 (2020), 8–14 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jp.v3i1.590>
Hidayat, Arief, ‘Negara Hukum Berwatak Pancasila’, in Materi Seminar Yang Disampaikan Dalam Rangka Pekan Fakultas Hukum, 2017
Indonesia Judicial Research Society, INDEKS AKSES TERHADAP KEADILAN DI INDONESIA 2019 (Jakarta, 2019)
Jayadi, Hendri, ‘Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Ahli Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia’, AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5.2 (2023), 1816–22 <https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3444>
Juanda, H. Enju, ‘Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4.1 (2016), 27–46 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409>
Latif, Abdul, ‘Jaminan UUD 1945 Dalam Proses Hukum Yang Adil’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 7.1 (2010), 49–66 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk714>
Mappasessu, Zulkifli Makkawaru, and Andi Tira, ‘Teori Pembuktian Pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Milik Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 6/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Wsn)’, Indonesia Journal of Legality of Law, 5.1 (2022), 167–73 <https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v5i1.1898>
Marda, Guruh, and Vito Dewangga, ‘Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Pengetahuan Hakim’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Kesejahteraan, 8.2 (2023), 35–49 <https://jurnal.uai.ac.id/index.php/JMIH/article/view/2306/1084>
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017)
Masinambow, Erich, ‘Kedudukan Doktrin Res Ipsa Loquitur Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perdata DAlam Kasus Malpraktik’, Lex Et Societatis, 4.5 (2016), 88–96 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v4i5.11956>
Nasir, Muhammad, Hukum Acara Perdata (Penerbit Djambatan, 2005)
Papendang, Nolfi, ‘Kekuatan Alat Bukti E-Mail Dalam Persidangan Kasus Perdata’, Lex Et Societatis, 5.1 (2017), 98–104 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i1.15169>
Putri, Filzah Arina, and Ahad Mahyani, ‘KeteranganTestimonium de Auditu Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Hakim’, Bureaucracy Journal, 3.1 (2023), 341–53 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.185>
RismaPuspitaNingrum, Sofyan Arief, and Herwastoeti, ‘Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.2871K/PDT/2017 Dalam Kasus Pengingkaran Akta Perjanjian Perdamaian No.04/PDT.G/2000/PN.Prob’, Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 1.1 (2021), 70–87 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v1i1.16126>
Rizan, Lalu Samsu, Nurjannah S., and Yulias Erwin, ‘Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Dan Kepastian Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata’, Jurnal Pro Hukum, 11.5 (2022), 410–25 <https://journal.unigres.ac.id/index.php/JurnalProHukum/article/view/2259/1662>
Sari, Novita Dyah Kumala, and Syafrudin Yud, ‘Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Pada Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Putusan Nomor 216/Pdt.G/2015/Pa.Sgt)’, Verstek, 4.3 (2016), 146–55 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v4i3.38773>
Simamora, Janpatar, ‘Kepastian Hukum Pengajuan Kasasi Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Vonis Bebas’, Jurnal Yudisial, 7.1 (2014), 1–17 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i1.90>
Sinaga, Niru Anita, ‘Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10.2 (2020) <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460>
Subekti, R, ‘Hukum Pembuktian’, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2008
Sutantio, Retnowulan, and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek (Mandar Maju, 2009)
Syahrani, Riduan, ‘Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata, Bandung: PT’, Citra AdityaBakti, 2004
Wantu, FenceM, ‘Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12.3 (2012), 479–89 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121>