GALLERY WALK’S AND PICTURE AND PICTURE TOWARD THE MATH’S RESULT STUDY

Annisa Mawardini, Teguh Prasetyo, Hadida Widyaningsih

Abstract

This research based on the fact that how low Math’s result study is. That is why the researcher applied Gallery Walk and Picture and Picture method. The aim of this study is to figure out the influence of Gallery Walk’s method implementation and Picture and Picture toward the Math’s result study. The method used was quasi experiment with the static group pretest-postest design. The population in this research was all the student of fifth grader in Pasirgaok 02 elementary school. This research used nonprobability sampling as the technique of sampling which consisted of the saturated sample from two classes experiment. This research used observation, test and questionnaire as the technique of collecting data. According to the analysis result, the average score of posttest class of experiment 1 was 69,5 and the experiment two was 74,8. The result of One Sample T-test was sig 0.00, thus, it was rejected since 0.00 < 0.05 which means the method of Gallery Walk influenced toward the result study of the student. There was a difference in both method through independent T test, sig (2-tailed) 0,05 which rejected to emphasize the difference. So that, there was an influence of Gallery Walk’s method implementation and Picture and Picture toward the Math’s result studyof the fifth graders of Pasirgaok 02 elementary school.

Keywords : Gallery Walk and Picture and Picture method, Math’s result study

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi., 2013. Prosedur

Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Fraenkel, J.R., dan Wallen, N.E. 2012. How to

Design and Evaluate Research in

Education. New York: McGraw-Hill

Hamdayama, Jumanta. 2014. Model dan

Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif dan

Berkarakter. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Juhanda, A. 2014 Pengembangan Asesmen

Portofolio Elektronik (APE) untuk Menilai

Sikap Ilmiah dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa

SMA pada Laporan Praktikum Pencemaran

Lingkungan. UPI: Tesis

Muljo, R. & Daryanto., 2012.Model

pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava

Media.

Nurdin, M. & Hamzah, BU., 2012.Belajar

dengan Pendekatan Pailkem. Jakarta: PT.

Bumi Aksara.

Rusdiana, M & Elis, R., 2015.Evaluasi

Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Pustaka

Setia.

Silberman, Melvin, L., 2005. Active Learning

Strategi Pembelajaran

Aktif.Yogyakart: YAPPENDIS.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian

Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanto, Ahmad. 2014. Teori Belajar &

Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta:

Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.