KETERAMPILAN MENULIS ESAI NARATIF BAHASA INGGRIS MELALUI STRATEGI PEER REVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian tindakan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan peserta didik dalam menulis esai naratif melalui penerapan peer review di kelas. Subjek penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas sebelas SMA Al Azhar Syifa Budi Jakarta. Beberapa aspek yang harus dipertimbangkan dalam menulis esai naratif yakni tujuan komunikatif yang ingin disampaikan, pengorganisasian menulis paragraph, dan tata bahasa yang tepat dalam mengekspresikan suatu kejadian di masa lampau. Proses pembelajaran harus didesain agar bisa mengontrol motivasi dan minat peserta didik. Interaksi sosial di kelas juga bisa membantu peserta didik agar lebih berhati-hati dalam menulis. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, pre test, catatan kolaborator, dan tes akhir. Berdasarkan observasi awal sebagai data pertama, maka disusunlah tiga siklus yang diharapkan mampu meningkatkan keterampilan menulis esai naratif peserta didik. Peningkatan keterampilan tergambar dari hasil tes pada setiap akhir siklus. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan selama satu semester yang terdiri dari tiga siklus. Perlakuan diberikan pada siswa di tiap-tiap siklus yang diikuti dengan tes pada akhir pembelajaran. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan cara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Peningkatan keterampilan menulis peserta didik bisa digambarkan berdasarkan hasil tes dan penilaian akhir penulis dan kolaborator. Hasil akhir yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa setelah peserta didik mengikuti proses pembelajaran dengan peer review di kelas, terdapat peningkatan keterampilan menulis esai naratif bahasa Inggris.
Kata kunci: karangan naratif, tutor sebaya, bahasa Inggris, menulis, penelitian tindakan
THE IMPROVEMENT OF NARRATIVE ESSAY WRITING ABILITY THROUGH PEER REVIEW
Abstract
The research of this action aimed to improve students ability in narrative essay writing through peer review. The subject of this research was the elevents year students of SMA Al Azhar Syifa Budi Jakarta academic year 2012/2013. The data has been collected through observation, pre test, certain treatment, collaborator arguments, and final test. Acording to the early observation, three stages had been planned, in order to improve syudents essay writing. The improvement of the students narrative essay writing has been described by the final tests of the each stage. There are some aspects should be considered in writing of essay narrative; the communicative purpose, the organization of the text, and the proper sentence grammar. Teaching learning process must be organized to keep the students motivation. The social interaction of the class can help the students to write more carefully. This action research was being conducted for one semester that consist of six meetings in three cycles. There are two meetings for each cycle. The treatment has been done in each cycle and joined the posts test at the end of the class. The data was analyzed in qualitative and quantitative procedures. The students improvement can be described by the final tests and the final judgement of the researcher and collaborator. The result of the study described that there were students improvement on the writing narrative text by the application of the peer review in the classroom.
Article Details
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Cohen L, M Lawrence, dan M Keith. 2007. Research methods in education. Routledge, New York.
Coulmas F. 2003. Writing systems an introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dowhan A, C Dowhan, dan D Kaufman. 2009. Essay that will get you into college. Dan Kaufman Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Date, New York.
Ferris D dan J Hedgcock. 2005. Teaching ESL composition: purpose, process and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New
Jersey.
Ferris D. 2003. Response to students writing: implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New
Jersey.
McNiff J dan W Jack. 2002. action research: principles and practice. Routledge Falmer, New York.
Oshima A and A Hogue. 2006. Writing academic english. Pearson Longman.
Penny U. 2003. A course in language teaching. Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Richard AP and MAA Snow. 2005. Academic success for English Language learners. Pearson Education, New York.
Rosidi I. 2009. Menulis siapa takut. Kanisius (IKAPI), Yogyakarta.
Seel MN. 2012. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer Science-Business Media, New York.
Shrum LJ dan WE Glisan. 2010. Teacher’s handbook: contextualized language instruction. Cengage Learning, HeinleBoston.
Sukardi. 2003. Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Suparno P. 2008. Riset tindakan untuk pendidik. Grasindo, Jakarta.
White VH dan R Doran. 2010. The fiction of narrative: essays on history literature and theory 1957-2007. John Hopkins University
Press, Baltimore.
Wyreck J. 2011. Steps to writing well with additional readings. Cengage Learning, Wodsworth.